Dans un climat de gestion plus rigoureuse des comptes publics européens, quelques remarques bien assénées qui divertissent des bigoteries « vertes » traditionnelles. Citons par exemple:
– « The basic objective of cutting CO2 emissions in Europe was in reality more easily obtained by outplacement, delocalisation and deindustrialisation, economic recession and rising unemployment ».
– « In reality, so-called “carbon trading” is an effective energy tax which the EU will most certainly not be able to impose on goods or services exported to Europe from outside the Union through trade sanctions and tariff barriers ».
ou encore;
-« The idea that the « greentech » sector can create and sustain large numbers of new jobs is totally disproved by reality ».
– « As green energy is highly capital-intensive, the target for generating electricity from renewable energy will involve a capital cost that is 9-10 times the amount required to meet the same demand by relying on conventional power plants, according to Hughes. In other words, job “creation” will be LOW OR negative ».
– « In many countries and in the EU itself climate and energy policies and programmes are already being adjusted or abandoned ».
LIRE la page de Andrew MacKillop sur European Energy Review.
Le 6 Novembre 2011
Laisser un commentaire